Hey men, so today I want to show you the real character of what’s consciousness created of.
Research, especially neuroscience, has been been grappling with this previous issue of what is consciousness made of.
And you know what? science has it all wrong.
You see, technology and civilization in general is currently closed in what’s named the materialist paradigm, also referred to as materialism.
Materialism wrongly makes the prediction that mind is extra, it is an emergent property.
Research tells you that consciousness stems from your own brain.
This can be a absurd notion, especially once you contemplate the epistemological opinion that technology holds, that is that everything is constructed of matter.
Research generally thinks that living is silly and brute, that living is simply a bunch of small balls (atoms) jumping down of each other.
That idea is nearly as ridiculous because the concept that some mathematicians hold about reality. There are a few mathematicians that opinion that reality is a mathematical method, in the literal sense!
Research is making the mistake of confusing the place for the terrain, in the deepest sense possible.
They’re puzzling conceptualizations and designs for actuality.
Be very suspicious of the states that folks caught in the materialist paradigm produce, they claim to understand what consciousness is, however they actually don’t.
To be able to understand what consciousness truly is you have to have many heavy awakening experiences.
Do do you know what could eventually a neuroscientist or any hardcore scientist if they actually discovered what consciousness?
They wouldn’t be considered a researcher anymore since they would end being fully a scientist. They’d be labeled a mystic or even a sage. They’d be enlightened.
In order for you to get a greater comprehension of mind I wish to give you a set of what consciousnesses positively is not.
What mind isn’t:
It is maybe not mind activity
It is maybe not purpose or information
It’s maybe not rationality
It’s perhaps not old-fashioned intelligence
It’s perhaps not emergent phenomena
It’s not organic or distinctive alive
It’s maybe not influenced by living
It’s maybe not subjective knowledge
It’s not perception
It’s perhaps not localized
It generally does not emerge from physical entities
It generally does not occur place or time
Again, every thing I listed above is not consciousness. Everything I in the list above is the conventional common position of pretty much everyone.
Almost all maintain the positioning that consciousness is emergent property, which can be false.
A leading exemplory instance of this is a quote from the late Stephen Hawking, he said:
“I do believe the mind is essentially a computer and mind is much like a pc program. It will cease to run when the pc is made off. Theoretically, maybe it’s re-created on a neural system, but that might be extremely tough, as it could involve all one’s memories.”
Fundamentally conventional research has that same perception on consciousness.
Mind is seen and compared to as application, and that application is influenced by and electronics such as a hard drive.
Science is not understanding the nuance and profundity of consciousness.
So What Is Mind Actually?
Stick with me as I understand that my reason and fights may sound like round reasoning, but as I said early in the day, all transmission is invalid and wrong.
Consciousness cannot be explained through language, that will be symbolic and conceptional in essence. It can just only be identified through experience.
Also although reality of consciousness cant be conveyed I do believe that my explanations through thinking can make more feeling then your reasoning that’s written by mainstream science.
Therefore I mentioned that consciousness is conventionally believed as some pc software that needs hardware.
Imagine if I told you that in actuality mind is more like software, and that computer software is maybe not dependent on almost any hardware to occur, that it exists by itself?
Effectively that is certainly the truth.
Mind is simple to everything, every thing is just a substrate of it. It’s so fundamental so it comes before existence itself.
Not merely does it emerge from nothing, it’s utter nothingness. It’s the nothingness from which everything, including existence, emerges from.
It’s very hard to communicate (actually impossible) the dept of genuine nothingness. The simplest way I can describe it’s similar to this, consider nothingness as living without any of it’s attributes, entirely empty. Even this description doesn’t get it done justice.
But Does not Mind Arise From The Head?
The most frequent debate I get from persons moves something such as this, but but demonstrably mind is just mind activity since if my brain is broken it will effect my consciousness.
The problem with the mind discussion is that folks aren’t planning serious enough epistemologically.
Think about that, but how did the brain come right into being? Can there be no actual consciousness at benefit the mind to ultimately come into being?
Again, every thing stalks from consciousness, even the simple regulations of the world is really a substrate of it.
This is the way I think of the brain debate, imagine enjoying a game and you are handling some personality that has a brain, and most of a sudden that character comes and hits his mind and dies.